Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
Activity 6: Eysenck’s taxonomy
Learners are expected to have weekly interaction with the Faculty Mentor as well as with other Learners through class participation in course Discussion assignments. Learners must post to each Discussion assignment at least twice each week as follows:
Where would you place yourself in Eysenck’s taxonomy? In what ways does this placement capture your personality? Also, in what ways, does it “miss the mark”? In other words, what are the limitations of Eysenck’s trait ?
Posting 1 (250 – 300 words)
The first post is a direct response to the topic for the week, written in the Learner’s own words to represent a broad integration of relevant knowledge and understanding of assignment topic. The post must include at least two scholarly sources in response that are not part of the required or recommended reading for the course.
Posting 2 (150 – 250 words)
The second post must address the topic collaboratively by commenting on the posting of least one of your peers and/or mentor
All posts must be written at the graduate level and include all in-text citations and references, according to 7th edition APA formatting
Formulate a personal assessment of personality development