Categories
Other / legal environment of business

If a creditor was involved, how would court rule differently, if at all?

Make sure to answer questions ABC in detail.
I will go first by way of example:
A. Under what scenarios may Campbell keep or return the ring? Explain. Why?
B. Does it matter who is responsible for breaking engagement? Why? Why not?
C. If a creditor was involved, how would court rule differently, if at all? Why?
You should post discussion answers in similar ABC format. Select different viewpoints and justify your responses utilizing critical thinking and legal reasoning using property law vocabulary studied this week.
full chapter plus question 48-8 would be included in uploaded files

Categories
Other / legal environment of business

I: issues: one or two sentences with the key issue or issues of the case

Use a 6-part framework to summarize the facts, issues, ruling, and conclusions of real-world legal cases.
Instructions: You will be assigned a case from the textbook to brief in a 3-page paper maximun. Use the SIRACY format to summarize cases in a way that exhibits critical thinking skills in a legal analysis. Submit your weekly brief to the appropriate Dropbox on PantherLearn.
S: Statement of the facts: half of a page of key facts of the case
I: Issues: one or two sentences with the key issue or issues of the case
R: Rule of Law: one paragraph detailing the laws pertaining to the case
A: Analysis: one to two pages of legal discussion from various points of view
C: Conclusion: one or two sentences stating the outcome of the case as decided by court
Y: You: one paragraph showing your critical thinking about the case