Categories
Health Care

Hide rubrics

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

5-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Evaluation Plan
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
In this module, you will submit a plan for measuring program performance and quality. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.
To complete this assignment, review the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric PDF document and the Final Project Template Word Document.
Hide Rubrics
Print Rubric
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Evaluation Plan: Summary
4 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the evaluation plan
3.6 points
Provides a one- to two-paragraph summary of evaluation plan, what qualitative and quantitative data will need to be collected, and plan for how to collect this data
2.8 points
Provides a one- to two-paragraph summary of evaluation plan, but the introduction does not adequately describe what qualitative and quantitative data will need to be collected and/or the plan for how to collect this data
0 points
Does not provide a one- to two-paragraph summary of evaluation plan, what qualitative and quantitative data will need to be collected, and plan for how to collect this data
Score of Evaluation Plan: Summary,/ 4
Evaluation Plan: Evaluation questions
50 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the evaluation questions
45 points
Forms three evaluation questions for each strategy (process/outcome/impact)
35 points
Forms three evaluation questions for each strategy but questions are not well matched to the strategy or identification of one or more objectives as process, outcome, or impact contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not form three evaluation questions for each strategy (process/outcome/impact)
Score of Evaluation Plan: Evaluation questions,/ 50
Evaluation Plan: Indicator(s)
10 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the evaluation question details
9 points
Describes how the answer to each of the three evaluation questions will be measured
7 points
Describes how the answer to evaluation questions will be measured, but one or more indicators are not well suited for the question or indicators are not included for all three evaluation questions
0 points
Does not describe how the answer to each of the three evaluation questions will be measured
Score of Evaluation Plan: Indicator(s),/ 10
Evaluation Plan: Evaluation Details
28 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into one or more of the following: data source(s)/instrument, qualitative or quantitative, target population, timeline, and individual(s) responsible
25.2 points
Summarizes details for each evaluation question, including data source(s)/instrument, qualitative or quantitative, target population, timeline, and individual(s) responsible
19.6 points
Summarizes details for each evaluation question, including data source(s)/instrument, qualitative or quantitative, target population, timeline, and individual(s) responsible, but one or more of the details are not well suited to the evaluation questions
0 points
Does not summarize details for each evaluation question, including data source(s)/instrument, qualitative or quantitative, target population, timeline, and individual(s) responsible
Score of Evaluation Plan: Evaluation Details,/ 28
Articulation of Response
8 points
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
7.2 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
5.6 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response,/ 8
Total
Overall Score
Exemplary
91 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Proficient
71 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement
1 point minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident
0 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply